Journal of Advanced Materials in Engineering

Journal of Advanced Materials in Engineering

Fabrication and Characterization of an Electrochemical CD8⁺ T Cells Sensor Based on Polypyrrole/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Department of Materials Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Introduction and Objectives: Detecting the CD8⁺ T cell biomarker—a key indicator of immunological diseases—is often slow with current methods. This research aims to develop a sensitive, accurate, and easy-to-use electrochemical biosensor, utilizing reduced graphene oxide and polypyrrole nanocomposite, for on-site, sensitive, accurate, and rapid detection of CD8⁺ T cells.
Materials and Methods: The polypyrrole/reduced graphene oxide composite was deposited onto the sensor's working electrode using cyclic voltammetry with 15, 20, and 25 cycles, corresponding to sample codes A15, A20, and A25. To prepare the sample containing the polypyrrole and graphene oxide composite with the selected number of cycles under a UV lamp (sample code B20), the same procedure was repeated, followed by characterization of the samples. Antibody immobilization was then performed on the developed electrode, and sensor performance was assessed using differential pulse voltammetry.
Results: FESEM imaging revealed that the sample A20 had a more uniform and porous surface morphology compared to the sample B20. According to the differential pulse voltammetry results, an increase in the concentration of CD8⁺ T cells led to a decrease in current intensity. Based on the calibration curve, the detection limit was determined to be seven cells.ml-1, indicating the high sensitivity of the sensor in identifying CD8⁺ T cells.
Conclusion: Sample A20 was identified as the optimal structure for application in electrochemical biosensors based on Ppy-rGo composite to detect CD8+ T cells.
Keywords
Subjects

1. Lin Y, Ruze R, Zhang R, Tuergan T, Wang M, Tulahong A, et al. Immunometabolic targets in CD8⁺ T Cells within the tumor microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Cancer 2024;14:474-496.http://doi.org/10.1159/000542578
2. Jia J, Li H, Huang Z, Yu J, Zheng Y, Cao B. Comprehensive immune landscape of lung-resident memory CD8⁺ T cells after influenza infection and reinfection in a mouse model. Front Microbiol. 2023;14:1184884.http://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1184884
3. Martinez M, Moon EK. CAR T Cells for solid tumors: New strategies for finding, infiltrating, and surviving in the tumor microenvironment. Front Immunol. 2019;10(128):1-21. http://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.00128
4. Nasser Gholijani GD, Fatemeh Rezaei Kahmini. T cell-Intrinsic peripheral tolerance: A checkpoint target to treat autoimmunity. J Cell Immunol. 2024;6:87-97. https://doi.org/10.33696/immunology.6.194
5. van de Sandt CE, McQuilten HA, Aban M, Nguyen THO, Valkenburg SA, Grant EJ, et al. Gradual changes within long-lived influenza virus-specific CD8⁺ T cells are associated with the loss of public TCR clonotypes in older adults. EBioMedicine 2025;115:105697.http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2025.105697
6. van der Leun AM, Thommen DS, Schumacher TN. CD8⁺ T cell states in human cancer: insights from single-cell analysis. Nat Rev Cancer 2020;20(4):218-32. http://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.894919
7. Monsef R, Salavati-Niasari M. Electrochemical sensor based on a chitosan-molybdenum vanadate nanocomposite for detection of hydroxychloroquine in biological samples. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;613:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.01.039 
8. Lin Y, Song Y, Zhang Y, Li X, Kan L, Han S. New insights on anti-tumor immunity of CD8⁺ T cells: Cancer stem cells, tumor immune microenvironment and immunotherapy. J Transl Med. 2025;23(1):341. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-025-06291-y
9. Dror Levinsky M, Brenner B, Yalon M, Levi Z, Livneh Z, Cohen Z, et al. A highly sensitive flow cytometric approach to detect rare antigen-specific T Cells: development and comparison to standard monitoring tools. Cancers (Basel) 2023;15(3):574. http://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030574
10. Monsef R, Salavati-Niasari M. Hydrothermal architecture of Cu5V2O10 nanostructures as new electro-sensing catalysts for voltammetric quantification of mefenamic acid in pharmaceuticals and biological samples. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021; 178:113017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113017
11. Davtalab-Ghazimahalleh M, Hosseini-Golgoo SM, Zamani H. Manufacturing and characterization of a potentiometric sensor highly sensitive to NO2 gas, based on K2CO3/Al2O3 composite material. J Adv Mater Eng. 2024;43(4):69-84. https://doi.org/10.47176/jame.43.4.1087
12. Bertolini M, Wong MS, Mendive-Tapia L, Vendrell M. Smart probes for optical imaging of T cells and screening of anti-cancer immunotherapies. Chem Soc Rev. 2023;52(16):535.2-72. http://doi.org/10.1039/d2cs00928e
13. Ravikiran YT, Chethan B, Prasad V, Raj Prakash HG, Prashantkumar M, Tiwari SK, et al. Polypyrrole/reduced graphene oxide composite as a low-cost novel sensing material for fast-response humidity sensor. Mater Chem Phys. 2023;303:127800. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.127800
14. Goudarzi M, Salavati-Niasari M, Motaghedifard M, Hosseinpour-Mashkani SM. Semiconductive Tl2O3 nanoparticles: Facile synthesis in liquid phase, characterization and its applications as photocatalytic substrate and electrochemical sensor. J Mol Liq. 2016;219:720-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.007
15. Carinelli S, Xufre Ballesteros C, Marti M, Alegret S, Pividori MI. Electrochemical magneto-actuated biosensor for CD4 count in AIDS diagnosis and monitoring. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;74:974-80. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.bios.2015.07.053
16. Baladi M, Teymourinia H, Dawi EA, Amiri M, Ramazani A, Salavati-Niasari M. Electrochemical determination of imatinib mesylate using TbFeO3/g-C3N4 nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode. Arab J Chem. 2023;16:104963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.104963
17. Bialas K, Tay HM, Petchakup C, Salimian R, Ward SG, Lindsay MA, et al. Electrochemical microfluidic biosensor for the detection of CD4(+) T cells. Microsyst Nanoeng. 2025;11(63):1-13.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41378-025-00893-8
18. Yadegari A, Omidi M, Yazdian F, Zali H, Tayebi L. An electrochemical cytosensor for ultrasensitive detection of cancer cells using modified graphene–gold nanostructures. RSC Adv. 2017;7(4):2365-72. http://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra25938c
19. Ghasemi Z, Kharaziha M, Raeissi K, Karimzadeh F. Fabrication and characterization of a non-enzymatic electrochemical sensor based on molecularly imprinted polymer for glucose monitoring in medical systems. J Adv Mater Eng. 2025;45(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.47176/jame.45.1.1110
20. Hasani A, Baniadam M, Maghrebi M. Novel approach for electrochemical functionalization of graphene with surfactant. J Adv Mater Eng. 2022;35(4):27-38. http://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.jame.35.4.27
21. Oleneva E, Khaydukova M, Ashina J, Yaroshenko I, Jahatspanian I, Legin A, et al. A Simple procedure to assess limit of detection for multisensor systems. Sensors 2019;19(6):1359. http://doi.org/10.3390/s19061359
22. Ganguly A, Ebrahimzadeh T, Zimmern PE, De Nisco NJ, Prasad S. Label free, lateral flow prostaglandin E2 electrochemical immunosensor for urinary tract infection diagnosis. Chemosensors 2021;9(9):271. http://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors9090271
23. Parayangattil Jyothibasu J, Chen MZ, Lee RH. Polypyrrole/Carbon nanotube freestanding electrode with excellent electrochemical properties for high-performance all-solid-state supercapacitors. ACS Omega 2020;5(12):6441-51. http://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b04029
24. Seema S, Prasad MVNA. Dielectric Spectroscopy of Nanostructured Polypyrrole-NiO Composites. J Polym. 2014;2014:1-5. http://doi.org/10.1155/2014/950304
25. Wang X, Yang C, Li H, Liu P. Synthesis and electrochemical performance of well-defined flake-shaped sulfonated graphene/polypyrrole composites via facile in situ doping polymerization. Electrochimica Acta 2013;111:729-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.08.145
26. Zine PC, Narwade VN, Patil SS, Qureshi MT, Tsai M-L, Hianik T, et al. Sensitive electrochemical sensor based on amino-functionalized graphene oxide/polypyrrole composite for detection of Pb2+ ions. Chemosensors 2025;13(2):34. http://doi.org/10.3390/chemosensors13020034
27. Yang Y, Yang X, Yang W, Li S, Xu J, Jiang Y. Porous conducting polymer and reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites for room temperature gas detection. RSC Adv. 2014;4(80):42546-53. http://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra06560c
28. Hu J, Li Y, Gao G, Xia S. A Mediated BOD biosensor based on immobilized B. subtilis on three-dimensional porous Graphene-Polypyrrole composite. Sensors (Basel) 2017;17(11):2594. http://doi.org/10.3390/s17112594
29. Wang M, Zhang D, Yang A, Wang D, Zong X. Fabrication of polypyrrole/graphene oxide hybrid nanocomposite for ultrasensitive humidity sensing with unprecedented sensitivity. J Mater Sci. 2019;30(5):4967-76. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-00793-4
30. Umar MF, Nasar A. Reduced graphene oxide/polypyrrole/nitrate reductase deposited glassy carbon electrode (GCE/RGO/PPy/NR): biosensor for the detection of nitrate in wastewater. Appl Water Sci. 2018;8(211). http://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0860-1
31. Kiew LV, Chang CY, Huang SY, Wang PW, Heh CH, Liu CT, et al. Development of flexible electrochemical impedance spectroscopy-based biosensing platform for rapid screening of SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors. Biosens Bioelectron. 2021;183:113-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2021.113213
32. Myndrul V, Tamashevski A, Lipinska W, Siuzdak K, Iatsunskyi I. Highly sensitive electrochemical multimodal immunosensor for cluster of differentiation 5 (CD5) detection in human blood serum for early stage cancer detection based on laser-processed Ti/Au electrodes. Talanta 2024;279: 126612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2024.126612
33. Sanjayan CG, Gokavi L, Ravikumar CH, Balarkishna RG. Antibody-modified 2D MXene nanosheet probes for selective, picolevel detection of cancer biomarkers. Biosens Bioelectron. 2025;271:117028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2024.117028
 
 

تحت نظارت وف بومی